Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of AuthorChecklist
- Timestamp:
- 07/10/13 11:18:40 (11 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
AuthorChecklist
v1 v2 1 1 = Checklist for Authors of Science Articles in Solar Physics = 2 3 4 (this version is from June 2011, but was never well distributed)5 2 6 3 == Background: == … … 22 19 * Data used in articles should be made publicly available. 23 20 * If the data is not already available from an archive, it should be included as a supplement to the article. 21 * Observations should be sufficiently described to allow reviewers or other scientists to easily verify the article's claims. 24 22 25 23 … … 28 26 * Have I described the data that was used in this research? 29 27 * In terms of the instrument / observatory / observatory group used? 28 * And the specific dataset that was used? (eg, used the PI provided Level 2 data vs. the L0 data that you processed yourself) 29 Note : working on recommendations for data providers to provide consistent names or identifiers to each dataset. 30 30 31 * In terms of day/time being analyzed? 31 32 * In terms of location being analyzed (if not 'full disk') … … 37 38 * In terms of where I obtained it from (from which archive, at what time) 38 39 39 * Have I describe the processing that was doneto the data for analysis?40 * Have I described the processing that I did to the data for analysis? 40 41 41 42 * Have I acknowledged software and tools used ... … … 51 52 * Have I provided an [http://solarnews.nso.edu/2009/20090801.html#section1 identifier for the event(s)]? 52 53 54 * Is the data available for others to review? 55 * Is the data available from an archive online, or have I included it for submission as a suplement to the article 56 * If I have significantly processed the data, have I included my data for submission as a suplement to the article?
