Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of AuthorChecklist


Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/22/15 18:34:06 (10 years ago)
Author:
joe
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • AuthorChecklist

    v3 v4  
    11= Checklist for Authors of Science Articles in Solar Physics = 
    22 
    3 TODO: clarify which of these apply to raw data vs. intermediary data vs. final results / published data. 
     3TODO: clarify which of these apply to raw data vs. intermediary data vs. final results / published data.  Also, try to clean this up so it's more cronological : (1) where you got the data from, (2) how you reduced the data, (3) other processing applied. 
    44 
    55== Background: == 
    … …  
    3434        *       In terms of location being analyzed (if not 'full disk') 
    3535        *       In terms of any subsetting done of the data? 
    36                 *       If using a lower cadence than the original data 
    37                 *       If using only a specific observing mode or filter 
     36                *       If using a lower cadence than the original data: 
     37                    * What cadence was used ('1 per minute' vs. '1 per day') 
     38                    * How the cadence aligned (eg, '1 per day, first image after midnight UT' vs. '1 per day, closest to local solar noon') 
     39                *       If using only a specific observing mode or filter: 
     40                    * 'total brightness' vs. 'polarized brightness' for instruments such as SECCHI/COR2 
     41                    * Specific wavelengths from SOHO/EIT, STEREO/SECCHI/EUVI, SDO/AIA, etc. 
     42                    * AEC vs. non AEC for SDO/AIA. 
    3843                *       If using cutouts from the original data 
     44                    * eg, "200 arcsec patch centered on AR10943" vs. "200 arcsec wide by 400 arcsec high centered on ... xSun, ySun" - 
     45‘... at 400 xSun,-600 ySun’ ;  ‘... at 45W60N’ 
     46 
    3947                *       If using reduced resolution images 
     48                    * The size of the resulting images, and how it was reduced. 
     49                    * '1024x1024 images, 4x4 binned' vs. '2048x2048 images, sampled using the lower left' 
    4050        *       In terms of where I obtained it from (from which archive, at what time) 
     51             * Specified which specific version of the data you used, if the archive provides more than one. 
     52                 * eg, 'daily movies' vs. 'level 0 FITS files' vs. 'level 1 JPEGs' 
    4153 
    4254*       Have I described the processing that I did to the data for analysis?