Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of AuthorChecklist

Timestamp:

04/28/15 14:43:24 (10 years ago)

Author:

joe

Comment:

--

AuthorChecklist

@@ -5 +5 @@
 * Ensure that research is reproducible.
 * Track information that might affect your analysis
-* Make it easier for others to retrieve the data that you used.
+* Make it easier for others to retrieve the data that you used (to reviewing or expand your work)
 * Allow data archives & software authors to find who's using their work, so they can get continued funding.
+* Allow archives to determine when re-calibration may affect published literature.
 
 == Background: ==
@@ -60 +61 @@
 * Have I described the data that was used in this research?
         *       In terms of the instrument / observatory / observatory group used?
-                *       And the specific dataset that was used?  (eg, used the PI provided Level 2 data vs. the L0 data that you processed yourself)
-                        Note : working on recommendations for data providers to provide consistent names or identifiers to each dataset.
-
+                *       And the specific dataset that was used?  (eg, used the PI provided Level 2 data vs. the L0 data that you processed yourself)  Note : working on [http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10194 recommendations for data providers to provide consistent names or identifiers to each dataset].
         *       In terms of day/time being analyzed?
         *       In terms of location being analyzed (if not 'full disk')
@@ -79 +78 @@
                 *       If using reduced resolution images
                     * The size of the resulting images, and how it was reduced.
-                    * '1024x1024 images, 4x4 binned' vs. '2048x2048 images, sampled using the lower left'
+                    * '1024x1024 images, 4x4 binned' vs. '2048x2048 images, sampled using the lower left pixel'
         *       In terms of where I obtained it from (from which archive, at what time)
              * Specified which specific version of the data you used, if the archive provides more than one.
                  * eg, 'daily movies' vs. 'level 0 FITS files' vs. 'level 1 JPEGs'
 
-*       Have I described the processing that I did to the data for analysis?
+*       Have I described any additional processing that I did to the data for analysis?
+        * Flat fielding, point spread removed, etc.
 
 *       Have I acknowledged software and tools used ...