| 1 | == Observable == |
| 2 | |
| 3 | It is in the description of the independent variables, what the data |
| 4 | in fact measure, that there is the greatest variation in terminology |
| 5 | among data archives. Most solar observational data consist of direct |
| 6 | measurements of the intensity of radiation as a function of time, |
| 7 | direction (location), wavelength, and polarization, or combinations |
| 8 | of intensities associated with different independent variables (''e.g.'' |
| 9 | line shifts and splittings, Stokes parameters). These data may be |
| 10 | interpreted as measurements of certain physical observables, such as |
| 11 | temperature, velocity, emission measure, etc. via models. There are |
| 12 | of course some important exceptions: some solar data archives include |
| 13 | ''in situ'' measurements of such observables as particle fluxes and |
| 14 | compositions and magnetic field strengths; some solar data sets represent |
| 15 | not direct observation but the results of complex inversions or modeling, |
| 16 | such as the frequencies of acoustic modes, or the interior structure; |
| 17 | and there are catalogs, histories, and descriptions of features and events. |
| 18 | As long as the various observable classes are orthogonal, however, these |
| 19 | additional cases should present no problem. |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | The model of describing observables in terms of particular combinations |
| 23 | of intensity measurements or the associated physical parameters to be derived |
| 24 | from them is a natural one for data deriving from imaging spectrographs, |
| 25 | such as magnetographs and helioseismic instruments. For cameras or |
| 26 | radiometers measuring only intensity or flux at selected wavelengths, |
| 27 | it is not so natural. People dealing with data from such instruments |
| 28 | tend to think of the observables as being associated with the spectral |
| 29 | wavelength or band selected, or for monochromatic instruments, even the |
| 30 | spatial-temporal target of the observations. It is important to |
| 31 | understand that the meaning of the term "observable" in the VSO Search |
| 32 | Parameter model may not at all agree with the meaning of the term as |
| 33 | used by the data providers. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | |
| 36 | |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ==== Physical_Observable ==== |
| 39 | |
| 40 | |
| 41 | type: ''menu''[[BR]] |
| 42 | FITS keyword: ''PHYS_OBS''[[BR]] |
| 43 | The following values are currently recognized: |
| 44 | |
| 45 | |
| 46 | ''' intensity ''' |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 49 | the direct intensity, either integrated over the spectral observing range |
| 50 | or as a function of wavelength (spectral density) |
| 51 | |
| 52 | |
| 53 | ''' equivalent_width ''' |
| 54 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | differences between intensities measured at nerbay wavelengths, |
| 57 | typically in line cores, wings, and nearby continuum, whether measured |
| 58 | as an intensity difference or an equivalent width |
| 59 | |
| 60 | ''' polarization_vector ''' |
| 61 | |
| 62 | |
| 63 | the net linear polarization |
| 64 | |
| 65 | ''' LOS_magnetic_field ''' |
| 66 | |
| 67 | |
| 68 | the frequency/wavelength Zeeman splitting between opposite circular |
| 69 | polarizations of a magnetically-sensitive line |
| 70 | |
| 71 | ''' vector_magnetic_field ''' |
| 72 | |
| 73 | |
| 74 | field strengths and directions inferred from Stokes polarimetry |
| 75 | |
| 76 | ''' LOS_velocity ''' |
| 77 | |
| 78 | |
| 79 | the displacement of line center from rest wavelength/frequency in |
| 80 | an arbitrary polarization state |
| 81 | |
| 82 | ''' vector_velocity ''' |
| 83 | |
| 84 | |
| 85 | two- or three-dimesnional velocities, typically inferred from |
| 86 | helioseismic inversion or from directly measured velocities transverse |
| 87 | to the line of sight, possibly combined with Doppler velocities |
| 88 | |
| 89 | ''' wave_power ''' |
| 90 | |
| 91 | |
| 92 | |
| 93 | ''' wave_phase ''' |
| 94 | |
| 95 | |
| 96 | |
| 97 | ''' oscillation_mode_parameters ''' |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 100 | These all refer to solar internal or atmospheric acoustic-gravity wave |
| 101 | measurements. The mode parameters could include frequencies, splittings, |
| 102 | amplitudes, widths, ''etc.'' |
| 103 | |
| 104 | ''' number_density ''' |
| 105 | |
| 106 | ''' particle_flux ''' |
| 107 | |
| 108 | ''' composition ''' |
| 109 | |
| 110 | ''' particle_velocity ''' |
| 111 | |
| 112 | ''' thermal_velocity ''' |
| 113 | |
| 114 | |
| 115 | ''' ''in-situ'' observations ''' |
| 116 | |
| 117 | |
| 118 | In addition to the above, the following classes have been suggested: |
| 119 | |
| 120 | |
| 121 | * Electric Field Strength - the Stark effect splitting |
| 122 | * Transverse Magnetic Field Strength - Hanle effect measurements |
| 123 | * Stokes Parameters ('''I, Q, U, V''' - equivalent to observables of net circular, linear and total polarization, and polarization angle |
| 124 | * ''in situ'' Magnetic Field |
| 125 | * Differential Emission Measure |
| 126 | * Model Parameters - Interior, Atmosphere, Solar Wind |